Judging

Judging will be by the following panel over the period 15 September to 1 October 2025

Judges

  • Paul Barton

    In my mid twenties I went to a woodturning display and decided I was going to  buy a lathe and start turning. Being self-taught there were many mistakes. I was drawn to the hollow vessel. I loved it's simplicity and the fact that hollow vessels are quite technically difficult to turn. In my work I try to create something that is naturally beautiful showcasing the raw material in its many forms. 

    Paul Barton
    Paul Barton Work

  • Simon Begg

    Simon is a full time turner based out of Sydney, Australia. He specialises in the more artistic side of turning, enjoying many unique commissions. German ring turning is one of the unique styles that Simon is known for but he also turns hollow forms, does carved embellishment and salad bowls.

    Simon Begg
    Simon Begg Work

  • Emma Cook (The Tiny Turner)

    Emma has been involved with the craft since she was 16. Now, she is the youngest Chair of the Register of Professional Turners in the UK. Emma is a popular demonstrator throughout the UK, Europe, America and Australia. As well as woodturning, Emma had an apprenticeship in wood carving and uses a variety of colouring techniques. 

     

    Emma Cook
    Emma Cook Work

  • Cindy Drozda

    Cindy’s work has been in exhibitions around the USA. She is an active member of the American Association of Woodturners, and demonstrates at national symposia and clubs. Through her videos, she shares her passion for woodturning with the entire community.

    Cindy Drozda
    Cindy Drozda Work

  • Guy du Toit

    Guy discovered woodturning in 2016 at Hamilton Woodturners Club - this transformed his life. In 2018/19 he studied at the Escoulen School then returned to New Zealand to refine his craft, before settling in Carcassonne, France in 2024. Guy, now a board member of the Association of French Artistic Woodturning, works from his home.

    Guy du Toit
    Guy du Toit Work

  • Phil Irons RPT

    Phil is known for his coloured vessels, with their clear beautiful shapes and flowing lines.  He uses bright contemporary colours to make the figure "pop" and the "hidden" figure can be seen. He has won awards and is invited to teach and demonstrate his techniques around the world.

    Phil Irons
    Phil Irons Work

  • Emmet Kane

    A self-taught wood sculptor from Ireland. He uses Irish wood from sustainable resources.  His use of gold leaf with ebonised oak and ever evolving textures creates stunning pieces of wall art. Emmet Kane has also gone back and visited bleaching the oak.  He is excited with the challenge of making, creating and finding new ways of pushing his skill.

    Emmet Kane
    Emmet Kane Work

  • Mark Sfirri

    Mark’s explorations into multi-axis turning began as a student in the Furniture Design Program at Rhode Island School of Design in the mid 1970s. He taught in the Fine Woodworking Program at Bucks County Community College from 1981 and became professor emeritus in 2017. A maker, researcher, writer and demonstrator throughout the western world.

    https://naw.org.nz/form/naw-expo-survey-2026
    Mark Sfirri Work

  • Peter Williams

    Woodturning started as a hobby in his mid-fifties as time spent on other commitments and work allowed. His love of the sea is reflected in many of his pieces, particularly the very thin-walled hollow forms. These are generally formed from timber won from storm damaged pohutukawa trees which can be seen lining the shores of many beaches. 

    Peter Williams
    Peter Williams Work

These judges will individually use the prescribed scoring system shown below and send their marks to the Steward.  The Steward will combine the scores to determine the winners.

Guidelines for Judging

  • Should there be any doubt about which category to place an entry in then the Senior Steward has the final decision.
  • Each item may be judged in only one class.
  • The judges should exclude from the competition any items which they deem to be unfit due to technical or artistic faults.
  • Any stand used to support the item will be deemed to be part of the item and judged along with the item.
     
  • All entries received will be judged using the following criteria – each criterion being scored out of 10 points:
  1. First impressions – visual impact.
  2. Design, innovation, ingenuity, originality.
  3. Form, proportion, balance and use of material.
  4. Creation techniques and skill level.
  5. Suitability and quality of finish.
  • The judges will score each piece individually and points allocated will be aggregated to give a final points score.
  • The judges are encouraged in their judging to spread the scores between 1and 10 to provide a clear differentiation between the pieces.
  • The scores recorded by the judges shall be available to entrants for the items they have entered in the competition.
  • A first, second and third prize, and “Highly Commended” certificates may be awarded in each category.
  • In the event that insufficient entries are received for a specific category OR the judge(s) deem the standard is not high enough, the judge(s) reserve the right not to award prizes.
  • The items gaining the highest score in each category shall be reconsidered by the judges for the “Supreme Exhibit” award.  In the event that more than one item has an equal highest score then the judges will re-evaluate the scores to declare one item “Supreme Exhibit”.  
  • The judge’s decision is FINAL.